Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| LSI-R: Level of Service Inventory-Revised× | SAPROF: Strukturierte Erfassung protektiver Faktoren für Gewaltkriminalität× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Forensische Psychologie | Forensische Psychologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1995 | 2012 |
| Urheber≠ | D. A. Andrews, James Bonta | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| Typ≠ | Interview-based / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Department of Psychology, Carleton University. link ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| Aliasnamen≠ | LSI-R, LSI-R-SV, Andrews-Bonta Risk Assessment | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| Verwandt | 4 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) is a 54-item assessment instrument developed by Andrews and Bonta (1995) to measure offender risk level and criminogenic needs (dynamic risk factors related to criminal behavior) in criminal justice populations. It is grounded in the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and is widely used in correctional facilities, probation/parole services, and forensic settings to inform release decisions, supervision intensity, treatment prioritization, and rehabilitation planning. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|