ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Linguistische Erweiterung von L2T-TOPSIS×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20102016
UrheberWei, G.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypLinguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α))Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleWei, G. (2010). Models for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with 2-Tuple Linguistic Assessment Information. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungL2T-TOPSIS (Linguistic extension of L2T-TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wei, G. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: L2T-TOPSIS · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare