Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Linguistische Erweiterung von L2T-SAW× | Best-Worst Method× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Entscheidungsfindung | Entscheidungsfindung |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 2018 | 2015 |
| Urheber≠ | Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. | Rezaei, J. |
| Typ≠ | Linguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α)) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Prioritization of the launch of ICT products and services through linguistic multi-criteria decision-making (2-tuple SAW). Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗ | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | — | — |
| Verwandt | 8 | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | L2T-SAW (Linguistic extension of L2T-SAW) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|