ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Intersectionality Analysis×Grounded Theory×
FachgebietGender StudiesQualitative Forschung
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19891967
UrheberKimberlé CrenshawBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TypCritical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
Wegweisende QuelleCrenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
AliasnamenIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Verwandt43
ZusammenfassungIntersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Intersectionality Analysis · Grounded Theory. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare