Methoden vergleichen

	Interpretive Kritische Diskursanalyse	Interpretive Diskursanalyse
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1990s–2000s	1980s–1990s
Urheber	Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions)	Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others
Typ	Qualitative discourse analysis design	Qualitative interpretive research approach
Wegweisende Quelle	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126	Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343
Aliasnamen	interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist	IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis
Verwandt	6	6
Zusammenfassung	Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent.	Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds.