Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Innovation System Functions Analysis× | Multi-Level Perspective on Transitions× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 2007 | 2002 |
| Urheber≠ | Marko Hekkert, Roald Suurs and colleagues | Frank W. Geels (building on Arie Rip and René Kemp) |
| Typ≠ | Functional analysis framework with event-history method | Conceptual framework and analytic method for sociotechnical change |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. DOI ↗ | Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | Functions of innovation systems, Seven functions approach, Event-history innovation analysis | MLP, Multi-level perspective framework, Sociotechnical transitions analysis |
| Verwandt | 4 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Functions of Innovation Systems analysis explains technological change by examining how well an innovation system performs seven key functions—entrepreneurial activities, knowledge development, knowledge diffusion, guidance of the search, market formation, resource mobilisation, and the creation of legitimacy. Associated with Hekkert, Suurs, and colleagues at Utrecht, the approach operationalises these functions through event-history analysis: a chronological dataset of innovation events is coded, functional performance is tracked over time, and the reinforcing feedback loops—the 'motors' of cumulative causation—that drive a system's rise or stagnation are identified. | The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) is a middle-range framework for analysing how large sociotechnical systems—energy, mobility, food, water—shift from one dominant configuration to another. It locates change in the interplay of three analytic levels: protected niches where radical novelties incubate, the incumbent sociotechnical regime that structures ordinary practice, and a slow-moving exogenous landscape. Transitions occur when landscape pressures destabilise the regime and open windows of opportunity for maturing niche innovations to break through. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|