Methoden vergleichen

	In Vivo Coding	Inhaltsanalyse
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1967 (grounded theory origins); widely codified as a distinct method from the 1990s onward	Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
Urheber	Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (grounded theory tradition); systematised and named by Johnny Saldaña	Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
Typ	Qualitative research method	Qualitative / mixed-method research technique
Wegweisende Quelle	Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1529731743	Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
Aliasnamen	verbatim coding, literal coding, first-cycle in vivo coding, indigenous coding	İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
Verwandt	6	5
Zusammenfassung	In vivo coding is a qualitative first-cycle coding strategy in which the researcher uses the participants' own words or short phrases verbatim as code labels, rather than imposing researcher-generated or theoretical language. The technique preserves the voice, meaning, and conceptual priorities of participants, making it especially valuable in grounded theory, phenomenology, and any study where honouring the emic (insider) perspective is central to analytic integrity.	Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.