ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Integrierte Bestimmung objektiver Kriterien-Gewichte×Additive Ratio Assessment×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20122010
UrheberZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypIntegrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Wegweisende QuelleZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungIDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: IDOCRIW · ARAS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare