ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Grey-TOPSIS×Kriteriengewichtung mittels Korrelation und Standardabweichung×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20152010
UrheberZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Bagocius, V.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypGrey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Wegweisende QuelleZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Bagocius, V. (2015). Multi-criteria selection of a deep-water port in the Eastern Baltic Sea. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungGREY-TOPSIS (Grey-TOPSIS — Grey extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Bagocius, V. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: GREY-TOPSIS · CCSD. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare