ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Beurteilung von Betrugsrisiken×Jones-Modell für Rückstellungen×
FachgebietRechnungswesenRechnungswesen
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20021991
UrheberAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)Jennifer J. Jones
TypFraud risk assessment and audit procedure frameworkFinancial statement analysis technique
Wegweisende QuelleAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228. DOI ↗
AliasnamenFraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud AssessmentModified Jones Model
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungFraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.The Jones Accrual Model, developed by Jennifer J. Jones in 1991, is a statistical method for detecting earnings management in financial statements by isolating abnormal accruals. It distinguishes between normal business accruals and potentially manipulated accruals, helping auditors and analysts identify potential financial statement fraud.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Fraud Risk Assessment · Jones Accrual Model. Abgerufen am 2026-06-19 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare