Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Feldbezogene qualitative Inhaltsanalyse× | Feldgestützte Diskursanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Qualitativ | Qualitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1980s–2000s | 1980s–1990s |
| Urheber≠ | Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); applied to field settings via ethnographic and naturalistic inquiry traditions | Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative analysis method | Qualitative analytical framework |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302 |
| Aliasnamen | field QCA, naturalistic qualitative content analysis, fieldwork-grounded content analysis, field-integrated QCA | field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA |
| Verwandt≠ | 3 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Field-based qualitative content analysis (field QCA) combines systematic, category-driven content analysis with data collected directly in naturalistic settings. Rather than working with pre-existing texts or archived material, the researcher gathers documents, field notes, artifacts, and informal textual records during fieldwork and subjects them to rigorous qualitative content analysis. The approach preserves the contextual depth of field inquiry while applying the structured, transparent analytic logic that distinguishes qualitative content analysis from purely impressionistic reading. | Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|