ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Feldgestützte Diskursanalyse×Grounded Theory×
FachgebietQualitativQualitative Forschung
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1980s–1990s1967
UrheberSynthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John FrowBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TypQualitative analytical frameworkMethod
Wegweisende QuelleBourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Aliasnamenfield discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDAGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Verwandt63
ZusammenfassungField-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Field-based Discourse Analysis · Grounded Theory. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare