Methoden vergleichen

	Feldtheoretische Kritische Diskursanalyse	Kritische Diskursanalyse
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1999–2001	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Urheber	Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Qualitative critical discourse framework	Qualitative research method
Wegweisende Quelle	Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Aliasnamen	Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Verwandt	5	6
Zusammenfassung	Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.