ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Feminist Standpoint Analysis×Intersectionality Analysis×
FachgebietGender StudiesGender Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19831989
UrheberNancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra HardingKimberlé Crenshaw
TypCritical feminist epistemology and analytic frameworkCritical qualitative analytic framework
Wegweisende QuelleHarding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗
AliasnamenStandpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint MethodologyIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungFeminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Feminist Standpoint Analysis · Intersectionality Analysis. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare