ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Faktorgewichtungsmethode×Additive Ratio Assessment×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20202010
UrheberŽižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypWeight_Subjective (pairwise factor relationship matrix, closed-form weights)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Wegweisende QuelleŽižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. (2020). Novel integrated multi-criteria ranking methodology: Case of public administration efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungFARE (Factor Relationship weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: FARE · ARAS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare