Methoden vergleichen

	Persönliches Forschungstagebuch	Forschungstagebuch
Fachgebiet	Umfragemethodik	Umfragemethodik
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature)	1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology
Urheber	Robert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing)	Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment)
Typ	Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool	Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool
Wegweisende Quelle	Holly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592	Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83.
Aliasnamen	in-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive log	researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary
Verwandt	6	6
Zusammenfassung	A face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research.	A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument.