Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Face-to-face Fokusgruppe× | Face-to-face Semi-structured Interview× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Umfragemethodik | Umfragemethodik |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1940s (Merton & Lazarsfeld); systematised 1980s–1990s | 1940s onward; widely codified in the 1980s–1990s |
| Urheber≠ | Robert K. Merton and Paul Lazarsfeld (focused interview); Richard Krueger and David Morgan (applied focus group methodology) | Rooted in sociological interview traditions; systematised by researchers including Robert Merton and Paul Lazarsfeld (focused interview, 1940s) and later elaborated by Steinar Kvale |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative group data-collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483365244 | Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198722519 |
| Aliasnamen | in-person focus group, FGD, co-located focus group, face-to-face FGD | in-person semi-structured interview, semi-structured personal interview, guided face-to-face interview, FFSSI |
| Verwandt≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | A face-to-face focus group is a structured, moderated group discussion conducted in a shared physical space, typically with 6–10 participants who are selected because they share a relevant characteristic. The moderator follows a semi-structured topic guide to elicit opinions, perceptions, and experiences. Unlike surveys, focus groups capture social interaction — agreement, disagreement, and the group dynamics through which attitudes are formed and expressed. | A face-to-face semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher meets a participant in person and follows a prepared topic guide of open-ended questions while retaining the flexibility to probe, reorder, and explore emerging themes. It combines the consistency of a predetermined agenda with the depth and responsiveness of an open dialogue, making it one of the most widely used methods in qualitative and mixed-methods research across the social, health, and educational sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|