Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Ethnographic Interview× | Free Listing× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1979 | 1988 |
| Urheber≠ | James P. Spradley | Cognitive anthropology tradition (formalized by Weller & Romney; Borgatti) |
| Typ≠ | Structured developmental sequence of interview questions for eliciting cultural knowledge | Elicitation procedure for the items and salience of a cultural domain |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968 | Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection. Qualitative Research Methods Series 10. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780803930742 |
| Aliasnamen | Spradley Interview, Developmental Research Sequence Interview, Ethnographic Interviewing, Domain Elicitation Interview | Free Lists, Free-List Task, Free Recall Listing, Freelisting |
| Verwandt≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | The ethnographic interview, formalized by James Spradley, is a deliberately staged conversation whose goal is to discover how an insider categorizes and talks about their own cultural world rather than to test the researcher's categories. It proceeds through a developmental research sequence of question types — broad grand-tour questions, fine-grained descriptive questions, structural questions that probe how knowledge is organized, and contrast questions that surface the distinctions informants draw between terms. The point is not a list of facts but a reconstructed map of meanings expressed in the informant's own native terms. | Free listing is a foundational elicitation technique in cognitive anthropology in which informants are asked to name, in any order, all the items they can think of that belong to a cultural domain — for example 'all the kinds of fruit' or 'all the things that can give you a cold.' Aggregating these lists reveals both the content of the domain (which items belong) and the salience of each item (how culturally central it is), inferred from how frequently and how early it is mentioned. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|