Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Dynamische kontrafaktische Wirkungsabschätzung× | Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Kausale Inferenz | Kausale Inferenz |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1986–2009 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| Urheber≠ | Robins (1986); Lechner (2009) for sequential treatment settings | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| Typ≠ | Causal inference / program evaluation | Causal inference / reweighting |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Robins, J. M. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period — application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling, 7(9-12), 1393-1512. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | dynamic CIE, dynamic treatment evaluation, time-varying counterfactual analysis, longitudinal counterfactual evaluation | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| Verwandt | 6 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Dynamic Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (dynamic CIE) extends standard counterfactual program evaluation to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially across multiple periods. Rather than comparing a single treated versus untreated state, it estimates the causal effect of entire treatment trajectories or regimes, accounting for how intermediate outcomes and time-varying covariates feed back into subsequent treatment decisions. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|