ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Analyse von gerichteten Ego-Netzwerken×Directed Betweenness Centrality×
FachgebietNetzwerkanalyseNetzwerkanalyse
FamilieMachine learningMachine learning
Entstehungsjahr1954–20051977
UrheberBarnes, J. A.; Bott, E.; extended by Everett & BorgattiFreeman, L. C.
TypEgocentric network methodCentrality measure (directed graph)
Wegweisende QuelleEverett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Ego network betweenness. Social Networks, 27(1), 31–38. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Aliasnamendirected personal network analysis, asymmetric ego network, directed egocentric network analysis, directed egonet analysisdirected BC, digraph betweenness, asymmetric betweenness centrality, directed Freeman betweenness
Verwandt55
ZusammenfassungDirected ego network analysis examines the personal network of a focal node — the ego — by distinguishing the direction of each tie: who sends resources, support, or information to the ego, and to whom the ego sends them. This asymmetric perspective reveals role differentiation, dependence, and brokerage that undirected ego networks cannot capture.Directed Betweenness Centrality extends Freeman's classic betweenness measure to directed graphs, quantifying how often a node lies on the shortest directed paths between all other pairs of nodes. It identifies gatekeepers, brokers, and bottlenecks in asymmetric flows such as information cascades, citation networks, and organizational hierarchies.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Directed Ego Network Analysis · Directed Betweenness Centrality. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare