ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Digitale Straußianische Grounded Theory×Konstruktivistische Grounded Theory×
FachgebietQualitativQualitativ
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1990 (Strauss & Corbin foundational); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
UrheberAnselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (foundational GT); adapted to digital contexts by subsequent methodologistsKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
TypQualitative research design and analysis approachQualitative research method
Wegweisende QuelleStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Aliasnamendigital GT (Straussian), Straussian GT in digital contexts, online Straussian grounded theory, digital Strauss-Corbin grounded theoryCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Verwandt66
ZusammenfassungDigital Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic, coding-driven approach of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory to digital data sources such as online forums, social media, chat logs, and digital documents. It retains the Straussian paradigm model and three-stage coding structure — open, axial, and selective — while adapting sampling strategies, theoretical saturation criteria, and ethical protocols to the unique features of online and digital research environments.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Digital Straussian Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare