Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Digital Government Assessment× | New Public Management Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Public Administration | Public Administration |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 2020 | 1991 |
| Urheber≠ | OECD digital-government programme | Christopher Hood |
| Typ≠ | Composite benchmarking index | Analytical assessment framework |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | OECD. Digital Government Index (DGI) and Digital Government Policy Framework. OECD, Paris. link ↗ | Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | Digital Government Index Method, Digital Maturity Assessment, GovTech Assessment, Digital Public Service Benchmarking | NPM Assessment, Managerialism Assessment, Public Management Reform Analysis, Hood NPM Doctrine Analysis |
| Verwandt | 4 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Digital government assessment measures how far a public administration has moved beyond merely digitising existing processes toward becoming digital by design — using data, platforms and user-centred service design as core operating principles. The OECD Digital Government Index, built on its six-dimension Digital Government Policy Framework, is the leading instrument, scoring countries on dimensions such as being digital by design, data-driven, government as a platform, open by default, user-driven and proactive. Evidence is collected through a structured survey, verified, scored and aggregated into a weighted composite. It complements the supply-focused UN E-Government Development Index. | New Public Management (NPM) assessment evaluates how far a public organisation or system has adopted the cluster of managerial reform doctrines that swept the public sector from the 1980s — and with what effects. Christopher Hood's 1991 article A Public Management for All Seasons? gave NPM its name and identified its core doctrines: hands-on professional management, explicit performance standards, output controls, disaggregation into units, competition, private-sector management styles, and discipline in resource use. The assessment scores adoption of these doctrines, evaluates their effects, and appraises the trade-offs against enduring public-service values such as equity and accountability. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|