ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Definition von Zusammenhängen zwischen Rangkriterien×Additive Ratio Assessment×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20212010
UrheberPamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypRanked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Wegweisende QuellePamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. (2021). Development of an alternative approach for the selection of suppliers under the conditions of fuzzy sets. Symmetry link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungDIBR (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: DIBR · ARAS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare