Methoden vergleichen

	Duale Hesitante Fuzzy-Erweiterung von EDAS	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Best-Worst Method
Fachgebiet	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Entstehungsjahr	2023	1980	2015
Urheber	Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.
Typ	Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Wegweisende Quelle	Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega
Aliasnamen	—	—	—
Verwandt	8	8	8
Zusammenfassung	DHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.