Methoden vergleichen

	Querschnittsstudie	Kohortenstudien-Design
Fachgebiet	Klinische Forschung	Klinische Forschung
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1950s-1970s	1970s-1980s
Urheber	Epidemiologists in the mid-20th century; formalized by Kelsey, Rothman, and others	Donald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiology
Typ	Research Design	Research Design
Wegweisende Quelle	Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195083299	Miettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235.
Aliasnamen	prevalence study, cross-sectional survey, snapshot study, survey design	prospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort study
Verwandt	2	2
Zusammenfassung	A cross-sectional study (or prevalence study) measures exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time, producing a 'snapshot' of a population. Respondents are recruited and surveyed (or examined) on the same occasion, capturing current prevalence of both exposure and disease. Cross-sectional studies are simple, quick, and inexpensive, making them popular for needs assessments, surveillance, and generating hypotheses—though they cannot establish causality due to lack of temporal sequence.	A cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.