ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Corpus Concordance Analysis×Kritische Diskursanalyse×
FachgebietLinguistikQualitativ
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1991Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
UrheberCorpus linguists (John Sinclair; Paul Baker)Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
TypCorpus-based descriptive analysis of word usage in contextQualitative research method
Wegweisende QuelleBaker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum. ISBN: 9780826477248Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
AliasnamenConcordance Analysis, KWIC Analysis, Keyword-in-Context AnalysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Verwandt46
ZusammenfassungCorpus concordance analysis is a core corpus-linguistic technique that retrieves every occurrence of a search word or phrase from a large body of machine-readable text and displays them in keyword-in-context (KWIC) format — the target term aligned in a central column with its surrounding co-text. By reading and sorting these lines, analysts uncover the recurrent patterns, collocations, and meanings of words as they are actually used, grounding linguistic claims in attested evidence rather than introspection.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Corpus Concordance Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare