ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Komplexe Proportionale Bewertung×Logarithmus-Methodik der additiven Gewichtung×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19962021
UrheberZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D.
TypProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Logarithm-based additive weighting
Wegweisende QuelleZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D. (2021). A new logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: Application in logistics. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.LMAW (Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: COPRAS · LMAW. Abgerufen am 2026-06-19 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare