ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Komplexe Proportionale Bewertung×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19962016
UrheberZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: COPRAS · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare