ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Conjoint Survey Experiment×Vignette Experiment×
FachgebietPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr2014
UrheberJens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei YamamotoSurvey and social-psychological research traditions
TypMulti-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimandsRandomized experiment using short described scenarios
Wegweisende QuelleHainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology, 6(3), 128–138. DOI ↗
AliasnamenCausal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experimentVignette study, Experimental vignette, Scenario experiment, Text-vignette experiment
Verwandt43
ZusammenfassungA conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.A vignette experiment presents respondents with a short, carefully constructed description of a person, situation, or scenario — a vignette — in which one or more features are experimentally manipulated, and then asks for a judgment, attitude, or intended action. By randomizing which version of the scenario each respondent reads, the researcher isolates the causal effect of each manipulated feature on the elicited judgment, combining the realism of a concrete scenario with the causal leverage of an experiment.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Conjoint Survey Experiment · Vignette Experiment. Abgerufen am 2026-06-25 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare