Methoden vergleichen

	Konkurrierendes eingebettetes Mixed-Methods-Design	Transformatives Mixed-Methods-Design
Fachgebiet	Forschungsdesign	Forschungsdesign
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	2003–2007	2003–2009
Urheber	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Typ	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Wegweisende Quelle	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Aliasnamen	embedded mixed methods, nested mixed methods design, concurrent nested design, CEMM	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
Verwandt	6	6
Zusammenfassung	The concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data at the same time, but assigns unequal priority to the two strands: one (usually quantitative) serves as the primary study, while the other (usually qualitative) is nested inside it to answer a supplementary question. The embedded strand does not stand alone; it provides a different perspective on the same phenomenon within a single unified study.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.