Methoden vergleichen

	Vergleichende Gesprächsanalyse	Diskursanalyse
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitative Forschung
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s	1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
Urheber	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward	Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
Typ	Qualitative micro-analytic research design	Method
Wegweisende Quelle	Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.	Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Aliasnamen	comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction	DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Verwandt	3	2
Zusammenfassung	Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction.	Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.