ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Cash Transfer Evaluation×Randomized Evaluation in Development×
FachgebietDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19972003
UrheberPROGRESA/Oportunidades (Mexico); Santiago Levy; World Bank evaluation programmesEsther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee, Michael Kremer; J-PAL / IPA
TypProgramme impact evaluationExperimental impact evaluation design
Wegweisende QuelleFiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN: 9780821373521Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2009). The Experimental Approach to Development Economics. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 151–178. DOI ↗
AliasnamenCCT/UCT Impact Evaluation, Conditional Cash Transfer Evaluation, Cash Transfer Impact Assessment, Social Cash Transfer EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials, Field Experiments in Development, RCTs in Development Economics, Randomized Field Trials
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungCash transfer evaluation is the body of impact-evaluation practice used to measure the effects of giving money directly to poor households — conditional on behaviours such as school enrolment and clinic visits (CCTs) or unconditional (UCTs) — on consumption, schooling, nutrition, health, and broader welfare. Pioneered by Mexico's PROGRESA/Oportunidades programme in the late 1990s, which built a randomised phase-in into its rollout, the field has produced some of the most influential causal evidence in development economics and now spans dozens of countries and hundreds of studies.Randomized evaluation applies the logic of the controlled experiment to development policy: an intervention — a school grant, a deworming pill, an insurance product — is assigned at random to some units and withheld from others, so that any subsequent difference in outcomes can be attributed causally to the intervention rather than to confounding. Championed from the early 2000s by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) and Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA), the approach earned its leading proponents — Esther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee, and Michael Kremer — the 2019 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for transforming how anti-poverty programmes are tested.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Cash Transfer Evaluation · Randomized Evaluation in Development. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare