Methoden vergleichen

	PRISMA-basierter Review mit bibliometrix-Unterstützung	Bibliometrische Analyse
Fachgebiet	Szientometrie	Szientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	2017 (bibliometrix); 2009/2021 (PRISMA)	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Urheber	Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix package); Moher et al. / Page et al. (PRISMA statement)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Typ	Software-assisted systematic review workflow	Quantitative literature analysis
Wegweisende Quelle	Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Aliasnamen	bibliometrix PRISMA review, R-bibliometrix systematic review, bibliometrix-enhanced evidence synthesis, bibliometrix-supported PRISMA review	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Verwandt	5	6
Zusammenfassung	A bibliometrix-assisted PRISMA-based review combines the structured, transparent reporting framework of PRISMA with the quantitative science-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package. The approach embeds bibliometric analyses — such as citation analysis, co-authorship mapping, and keyword co-occurrence — into the evidence-synthesis steps of a PRISMA-guided systematic review, enabling both rigorous literature screening and macro-level visualization of the intellectual landscape.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.