ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Bipolare Erweiterung von EDAS×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20212016
UrheberJana, C., Pal, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypBipolar outranking/ranking — Bipolar Fuzzy Set (BFS: positive membership μ⁺ ∈ [0,1], negative μ⁻ ∈ [-1,0])Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleJana, C., Pal, M. (2021). Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Computational and Applied Mathematics DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungBF-EDAS (Bipolar extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: BF-EDAS · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare