Methoden vergleichen

	Bayesian Multi-Objective Optimization	Mehrzieloptimierung – Gleichzeitige Optimierung widerstreitender Ziele
Fachgebiet	Simulation	Simulation
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	2006-2016	1896 (concept); 1989–2002 (evolutionary algorithms era)
Urheber	Emmerich, M.; Svenson, J.; and related Gaussian process optimization community	Vilfredo Pareto (concept); modern computational formulation by Goldberg and Deb et al.
Typ	Surrogate-model-assisted multi-objective optimizer	Optimization framework
Wegweisende Quelle	Svenson, J., Santner, T. (2016). Multiobjective optimization of expensive-to-evaluate deterministic computer simulator models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 94, 250-264.	Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester. ISBN: 9780471873396
Aliasnamen	BMOO, Bayesian MOO, Multi-objective Bayesian optimization, MOBO	MOO, Multi-Criteria Optimization, Vector Optimization, Pareto Optimization
Verwandt	3	3
Zusammenfassung	Bayesian Multi-Objective Optimization (BMOO/MOBO) uses Gaussian process surrogate models to approximate multiple expensive objective functions and guides the search toward the Pareto frontier with minimal real evaluations. By quantifying prediction uncertainty at each candidate point, it balances exploration of unknown regions against exploitation of promising solutions, making it especially powerful when each function evaluation is computationally or experimentally costly.	Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) is a mathematical and computational framework for finding solutions that simultaneously optimize two or more conflicting objective functions. Rather than collapsing all goals into a single scalar, MOO produces a set of trade-off solutions — the Pareto front — from which a decision-maker selects according to preference. It is widely used in engineering design, operations research, logistics, economics, and policy analysis.