Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| ANP× | Komplexe Proportionale Bewertung× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Entscheidungsfindung | Entscheidungsfindung |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Entstehungsjahr | 1996 | 1996 |
| Urheber≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| Typ≠ | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | — | — |
| Verwandt | 8 | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|