Methoden vergleichen

	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Borda-Wahl	Copeland-Methode
Fachgebiet	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Entstehungsjahr	1980	1900	1951
Urheber	Saaty, T. L.	Borda, J.-C. de	Copeland, A. H.
Typ	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Rank aggregation (positional voting)	Pairwise majority rule (Condorcet-based aggregation)
Wegweisende Quelle	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Borda, J.-C. de (1900). Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutin. Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, Paris	Copeland, A. H. (1951). A 'reasonable' social welfare function. Mimeograph, University of Michigan Seminar on Applications of Mathematics to Social Sciences
Aliasnamen	—	—	—
Verwandt	8	0	0
Zusammenfassung	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BORDA (Borda Count — Positional scoring rule for rank aggregation) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Borda, J.-C. de in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPELAND (Copeland Method — Pairwise majority voting with net win-loss score) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Copeland, A. H. in 1951. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.