ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineResponsible innovation and technology governance

Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  2. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs093

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/science-technology-studies/responsible-research-innovation-assessment

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateResponsible Research and Innovation Assessment (Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Assessment). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/science-technology-studies/responsible-research-innovation-assessment · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026