ScholarGate
Assistent
Latent structurePsychology of religion measurement

God Image Measurement

God image measurement quantifies the emotional, relational picture a believer holds of God — not the doctrines they affirm, but how they experience the divine as, say, loving or wrathful, accepting or rejecting, near or distant, controlling or permissive. Peter Benson and Bernard Spilka's 1973 study established the empirical approach: they measured the God image along evaluative dimensions and showed that it is systematically tied to the self, with people higher in self-esteem and internal locus of control picturing a more loving and accepting God. The tradition distinguishes the God image (the affect-laden, experienced representation) from the God concept (the formally professed theological description) and measures the former as a multidimensional latent construct from ratings of attributed divine characteristics.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Benson, P., & Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12(3), 297-310. DOI: 10.2307/1384430

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). God Image / God Concept Measurement (Loving and Controlling God Representations). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/religious-studies/god-image-measurement

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateGod Image Measurement (God Image / God Concept Measurement (Loving and Controlling God Representations)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/religious-studies/god-image-measurement · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026