ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineExperimental survey designs

Factorial Survey Experiment

A factorial survey experiment, often simply called a factorial survey, asks respondents to judge short descriptions — vignettes — whose multiple features are fully crossed and randomly varied. By factorially combining many dimensions, each at several levels, the design generates a large universe of vignettes; respondents rate a random sample of them, and regression of the ratings on the dimension levels recovers the independent causal effect of each feature on judgment. It scales the single-scenario vignette experiment up to many simultaneously manipulated attributes.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Wallander, L. (2009). 25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004
  2. Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology, 6(3), 128–138. DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000014
  3. Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.) (1982). Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780803918184

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Factorial Survey Experiment (Factorial Survey / Vignette Module). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/factorial-survey-experiment

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateFactorial Survey Experiment (Factorial Survey Experiment (Factorial Survey / Vignette Module)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/factorial-survey-experiment · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026