ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineCritical & feminist analysis

Intersectionality Analysis

Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

+3 mere

Kilder

  1. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  2. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. link
  3. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press. ISBN: 9780745684499

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Intersectional Analysis of Overlapping Systems of Power and Identity. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/gender-studies/intersectionality-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateIntersectionality Analysis (Intersectional Analysis of Overlapping Systems of Power and Identity). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/gender-studies/intersectionality-analysis · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026