Gå til indholdScholarGate
BibliotekMit bibliotekSkrivebordReview StudioAssistent
Log ind
NBD-Dirichlet Model/Bevis
Metodebevisregistrering

NBD-Dirichlet Model

The NBD-Dirichlet model is the canonical stochastic model of repeat buying and brand choice in stationary, competitive consumer-goods markets. Introduced by Gerald Goodhardt, Andrew Ehrenberg and Christopher Chatfield in their 1984 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society paper "The Dirichlet," it integrates two processes: how often households buy in a product category, modeled by the negative binomial distribution (NBD), and how those purchases are split across competing brands, modeled by a multinomial-Dirichlet process. From just a few parameters, the model reproduces a remarkably wide set of empirical regularities, including each brand's penetration (how many people buy it), its buyers' purchase frequency, repeat-purchase rates, the share of category requirements each brand earns, and the duplication of purchase between brands. The model encodes Ehrenberg's classic 'laws' of buying behavior, most famously double jeopardy, whereby small brands suffer twice over by having both fewer buyers and slightly less loyal buyers. It assumes a stationary, non-partitioned market with brand choice that looks like sampling 'as if from an urn,' and it serves as a benchmark of what normal, no-loyalty-segmentation buying looks like, against which deviations such as genuine partitioning or excess loyalty can be detected.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegistrering

Citater kopieret ordret fra metodens kilderegistrering. Ingen påstandsniveauverifikation er udledt heraf.

NBD-Dirichlet Model of Repeat Buying and Brand Choice
Taksonomisk metoderegistrering · regression-model / marketing
  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C. (1984). The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 147(5), 621-655. · DOI 10.2307/2981696
Åbn fuld metode

Kuraterede påstande

Påstande gemt i bevis-loggen, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterede påstande endnu

Denne visning opfinder ikke en påstandsvurdering, når loggen ingen har.

Relaterede metoder

Genereret fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinelt foreslåede relationer — ingen bevispåstand er udledt.

Same method familyBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainShare of Wallet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

1 registreret citat, kopieret fra metodens kilderegistrering.

Handlinger

Åbn metodeside
ScholarGate

Et indholdsfokuseret opslagsbibliotek over forskningsmetoder — hvad hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åbne data (CC-BY)

Opdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søg i metoder…
  • Gennemse efter fagområde
  • Fagområder
  • Rejse
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Reference

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodologi
  • Filosofi

Arbejdsområde

  • Mit bibliotek
  • Skrivebord
  • Chat

Virksomhed

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Posterne er sammenstillet fra publicerede kilder til reference. Det er dit eget ansvar at kontrollere, at oplysningerne er korrekte og egnede til din anvendelse.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et opslagsbibliotek over forskningsmetoder
  • Privatliv
  • Cookies
  • Vilkår
  • Slet konto