ScholarGate
Assistent
Latent structurePsychometrics / outcome-measure validation

Rasch Analysis of Disability Measures

Rasch analysis is a psychometric method, based on Georg Rasch's probabilistic measurement model, used to test and refine the disability, function, and participation scales that pervade disability and rehabilitation research. As set out for clinicians by Alan Tennant and Philip Conaghan in 2007, fitting the Rasch model checks whether a scale's items genuinely measure a single underlying trait at interval level, so that summing item scores into a total is justified. Because so many disability outcome measures simply add ordinal item ratings — assuming items are equally difficult and that ordinal categories behave like interval data — Rasch analysis provides the rigorous test of whether that common practice is actually valid.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358-1362. DOI: 10.1002/art.23108

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Rasch Analysis of Disability and Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/disability-studies/rasch-analysis-disability-measures

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side
ScholarGateRasch Analysis of Disability Measures (Rasch Analysis of Disability and Rehabilitation Outcome Measures). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/disability-studies/rasch-analysis-disability-measures · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026