Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Trianguleret dokumentsamling× | Indsamling af dokumenter fra flere kilder× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Surveymetodologi | Surveymetodologi |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1978 (triangulation); 2009 (document analysis as method) | 1970s–2000s (systematic articulation) |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation principle); Glenn Bowen (document analysis formalization) | Rooted in qualitative documentary traditions; codified in mixed-methods and triangulation literature (Denzin 1970s; Bowen 2009) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative/mixed-methods data collection strategy | Data collection strategy |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | documentary triangulation, multi-source document collection, cross-source document analysis, data triangulation via documents | multi-source documentary research, multiple-document data collection, multi-site document analysis, cross-source document gathering |
| Relaterede≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | Triangulated document collection is a qualitative data collection strategy in which documents from multiple independent sources are gathered and cross-checked against one another. By drawing on different document types — such as official records, personal archives, institutional reports, and media artifacts — the researcher reduces reliance on any single source and strengthens the credibility of the evidence base. The approach applies Denzin's data triangulation principle directly to documentary material. | Multi-source document collection is a data-gathering strategy in which researchers systematically locate, retrieve, and compare documents drawn from two or more independent sources — such as government archives, institutional records, media outlets, organisational reports, or digital repositories. By assembling evidence from diverse provenance, researchers can triangulate findings, detect discrepancies, and build a richer, more credible picture of the phenomenon under study than any single documentary source can provide. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|