Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Telefonassisteret semistruktureret interview× | Face-to-face Semi-structured Interview× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Surveymetodologi | Surveymetodologi |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1970s–1980s (widespread adoption in health and social research) | 1940s onward; widely codified in the 1980s–1990s |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Adapted from face-to-face semi-structured interviewing; telephone use in social research documented from the 1970s onward | Rooted in sociological interview traditions; systematised by researchers including Robert Merton and Paul Lazarsfeld (focused interview, 1940s) and later elaborated by Steinar Kvale |
| Type | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31(4), 391–398. DOI ↗ | Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198722519 |
| Aliasser | telephone semi-structured interview, phone-based semi-structured interview, TASI, telephone qualitative interview | in-person semi-structured interview, semi-structured personal interview, guided face-to-face interview, FFSSI |
| Relaterede | 6 | 6 |
| Resumé≠ | A telephone-assisted semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher conducts a guided conversation with a participant over the telephone, using a pre-designed topic guide that balances predetermined questions with freedom to probe and explore. It combines the flexibility of semi-structured interviewing with the geographic reach and logistical convenience of telephone communication, making it widely used in health, social, and organizational research. | A face-to-face semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher meets a participant in person and follows a prepared topic guide of open-ended questions while retaining the flexibility to probe, reorder, and explore emerging themes. It combines the consistency of a predetermined agenda with the depth and responsiveness of an open dialogue, making it one of the most widely used methods in qualitative and mixed-methods research across the social, health, and educational sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|