Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Social Functioning Assessment× | Standardized Clinical Cutoff× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Social Work | Social Work |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1976 | 1991 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Social-adjustment measurement tradition; self-report scale by Weissman & Bothwell | Neil S. Jacobson & Paula Truax |
| Type≠ | Assessment of a person's performance across major social roles and life domains | Method for judging whether individual change on a standardized measure is reliable and clinically meaningful |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(9), 1111–1115. DOI ↗ | Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | Social Functioning Measurement, Role Functioning Assessment, Psychosocial Functioning Assessment, Social Adjustment Assessment | Clinical Cutoff Score, Clinical Significance Method, Reliable Change Index, Jacobson-Truax Method |
| Relaterede≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | Social functioning assessment evaluates how well a person performs the major social roles of everyday life — work or school, family and parenting, intimate and social relationships, and economic and community participation — and how satisfied they are with that performance. Building on the social-adjustment measurement tradition and instruments such as Weissman and Bothwell's Social Adjustment Scale, it gives social workers a structured, quantifiable account of psychosocial functioning that goes beyond symptoms to capture the person-in-environment outcomes at the heart of social work. | The standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|