ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Social Construction of Technology×Social Shaping of Technology×
FagområdeScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår19841985
OphavspersonTrevor Pinch & Wiebe BijkerDonald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David Edge
TypeConstructivist theory of technological developmentAnalytic tradition and method in the sociology of technology
Oprindelig kildePinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136
AliasserSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysisSST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology framework
Relaterede44
ResuméThe Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.The Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Social Construction of Technology · Social Shaping of Technology. Hentet 2026-06-25 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare