Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Rough-TOPSIS× | Kriterie-vigtighed gennem interkriterie-korrelation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Beslutningstagning | Beslutningstagning |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2013 | 1995 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Type≠ | Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | — | — |
| Relaterede | 8 | 8 |
| Resumé≠ | ROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|