Sammenlign metoder

	Relative Deprivation Scale	System Justification Scale
Fagområde	Politisk psykologi	Politisk psykologi
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Oprindelsesår	1966	1994
Ophavsperson	Walter Runciman; Heather Smith & Thomas Pettigrew	John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji
Type	Self-report perception scale	Self-report attitude scale
Oprindelig kilde	Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232.	Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
Aliasser	RD Scale, Fraternal Relative Deprivation Scale, Group Relative Deprivation Measure	SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale
Relaterede	4	4
Resumé	The Relative Deprivation Scale measures the subjective sense that one's own group (fraternal/group relative deprivation) or oneself (egoistic/individual relative deprivation) is unjustly worse off than a relevant comparison standard, accompanied by feelings of resentment. Building on Runciman (1966) and synthesized by Smith and colleagues (2012), it captures the three-component process, cognitive comparison, appraisal of injustice, and affective resentment, that links inequality to political action.	The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale.