Sammenlign metoder

	Kvantitativt-dominant Multilevel Mixed Methods Design	Konkurrent triangulering mixed methods design
Fagområde	Forskningsdesign	Forskningsdesign
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Oprindelsesår	2003–2010	2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.)
Ophavsperson	Tashakkori & Teddlie (multilevel MMR); dominant-status typology formalized by Morse (1991) and elaborated by Tashakkori & Teddlie	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Oprindelig kilde	Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179
Aliasser	QUAN-dominant multilevel MMR, multilevel mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority multilevel design, dominant-status multilevel mixed methods	convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation
Relaterede	6	5
Resumé	Quantitative-dominant multilevel mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which quantitative inquiry carries the primary evidential weight while qualitative data play an auxiliary, illuminating role, and both strands are applied across two or more hierarchically nested levels of analysis — for example, students within classrooms within schools. The design is suited to research questions that require both statistical modeling of nested structures and contextual understanding of how those structures operate.	The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions.